Exact match. Not showing close matches.
PICList
Thread
'[TECH]:: TECH membership'
2008\07\14@090445
by
Apptech
I'd be interested in knowing how many people
1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
unsubscribe.
Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
de-lurk visibly.
Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
Russell
2008\07\14@092817
by
Carl Denk
|
Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
Will have to see how this shakes out. Have previously subscribed only to PIC and EE. Sometimes a thread seems to go on and on with little new info, and probably I have contributed to that :( also. Too much mail, using delete key without reading message, but then again there is detail of use to others, kind of grin and bear (bare (sp)) it.:)
And I am guilty of seeking help on stuff that is now considered off topic (Linux and Windows), where I have exhausted other more pertinent forums and found the solution here. Moderating should be somewhat tolerant, if only occasional and not abused.
Overall, think the list is good. :)
Apptech wrote:
{Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
> Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
> TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
>
>
>
2008\07\14@095453
by
Picbits Sales
I'm getting it automagically without having to change anything in my Piclist
settings.
I think I've got mine to receive all posts
Dom
{Original Message removed}
2008\07\14@095547
by
Bob Ammerman
I opted in
--- Bob Ammerman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Apptech" <spam_OUTapptechTakeThisOuT
paradise.net.nz>
To: "PIC List" <.....PICLISTKILLspam
@spam@MIT.EDU>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:02 AM
Subject: [TECH]:: TECH membership
{Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
> Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
> TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
>
>
> --
2008\07\14@100030
by
Roger, in Bangkok
This isn't a trick question is it ... ? Ya still got me all bamboozled over
that nonsense that OT doesn't stand for On Topic!
Okay, okay I'll slither back into lurch mode now ...
RiB
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Apptech <apptech
KILLspamparadise.net.nz> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
> Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
> TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
>
>
2008\07\14@100641
by
Derward Myrick
2008\07\14@101532
by
Roger, in Bangkok
DANG Russell! You mean we been disruptin' all those 'lectrons for naught in
order to opt in?! Sorry, I forgot to mention that I opted in ... and don't
even think for a nanosecond that I'm gonna unscribledebibble and let ya off
the hook!
RiB
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Derward Myrick <wdmyrick
spam_OUTearthlink.net>
wrote:
> Apptech, I am receiving TECH tag material automatically without doing
> amything.
>
> Derward
>
> ...
>
2008\07\14@102430
by
Bob Axtell
I plan to subscribe ASAP. Busy.
--Bob
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Apptech <@spam@apptechKILLspam
paradise.net.nz> wrote:
{Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
> Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
> TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
>
>
> -
2008\07\14@102844
by
Jake Anderson
I started doing stuff to get it,
forgot my password then ran out of time
but i still seem to be getting it ;->
Derward Myrick wrote:
{Quote hidden}> Apptech, I am receiving TECH tag material automatically without doing
> amything.
>
> Derward
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Apptech" <
KILLspamapptechKILLspam
paradise.net.nz>
> To: "PIC List" <
RemoveMEPICLISTTakeThisOuT
mit.edu>
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 8:02 AM
> Subject: [TECH]:: TECH membership
>
>
>
>> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>>
> <snip>
>
>> Russell
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>
>
2008\07\14@103651
by
D. Daniel McGlothin
I "Have explicitly subscribed to TECH".
Daniel
2008\07\14@103756
by
Dave Lagzdin
2008/7/14 Apptech <spamBeGoneapptechspamBeGone
paradise.net.nz>:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
>
opted-in, (#2)
D
2008\07\14@105746
by
Dwayne Reid
(2) for me - I had to explicitly subscribe.
dwayne
At 07:02 AM 7/14/2008, Apptech wrote:
{Quote hidden}>I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
>1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
>unsubscribe.
>
>Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
>de-lurk visibly.
>
>Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
>TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
--
Dwayne Reid <TakeThisOuTdwaynerEraseME
spam_OUTplanet.eon.net>
Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA
(780) 489-3199 voice (780) 487-6397 fax
http://www.trinity-electronics.com
Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing
2008\07\14@112447
by
James Bendall
Apptech wrote:
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
That one!
--
James
2008\07\14@113106
by
Don Kovalchik - W8DPK
I had to opt-in. Receiving posts just fine now.
Back to lurking . .
--Don--
Apptech wrote:
{Quote hidden}>I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
>1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
>unsubscribe.
>
>Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
>de-lurk visibly.
>
>Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
>TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
>
>
>
>
2008\07\14@115118
by
Peter Todd
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:02:26AM +1200, Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
Have always subscribed to everything, and use my email clients
thread-delete button with abandon... :)
- --
http://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIe2983bMhDbI9xWQRAidfAJ9w+kFFCRzL8jdT7a7uTDxs+1QwKwCffs9R
nQbgD17jSxVqQn7ZNq06EVM=
=bE33
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
2008\07\14@121701
by
Gaston Gagnon
Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
>
I do not know if I would have received TECH automatically because I
immediately explicitly subscribed (#2) when the news was out.
Gaston
2008\07\14@130745
by
Bob Barr
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:02:26 +1200, Apptech wrote:
>I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
>1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
>unsubscribe.
2. I "Have explicitly subscribed to TECH".
Regards, Bob
2008\07\14@133630
by
Yair Mahalalel
Confirmed infoholic with an Apptech habit. Did nothing to subscribe. The
system knows.
Yair.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:02:26AM +1200, Apptech wrote:
{Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
> Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
> TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
>
>
> --
2008\07\14@151023
by
Vic Fraenckel
|
Carl Denk wrote:
{Quote hidden}> Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>
> Will have to see how this shakes out. Have previously subscribed only to PIC and EE. Sometimes a thread seems to go on and on with little new info, and probably I have contributed to that :( also. Too much mail, using delete key without reading message, but then again there is detail of use to others, kind of grin and bear (bare (sp)) it.:)
>
> And I am guilty of seeking help on stuff that is now considered off topic (Linux and Windows), where I have exhausted other more pertinent forums and found the solution here. Moderating should be somewhat tolerant, if only occasional and not abused.
>
> Overall, think the list is good. :)
>
>
>
> Apptech wrote:
>
>> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>>
>> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
>> unsubscribe.
>>
>>
>>
1. Receiving automatically
2. Did NOT subscribe to TECH
3. Will wait and see
Vic
--
*____________________________________________________________________________________________*
*Victor Fraenckel
KC2GUI
windswaytoo ATSIGN gmail DOT com**
*
2008\07\14@155534
by
peter green
>1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
I was set to subscribe to everything and still get everything including
tech.
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
Afiact this only happened if you were previously set to receive
everything. Since afaict TECH is meant to fit somewhere between EE and
OT I would hope that there would be very few if any people in this category.
2008\07\14@161644
by
Richard Prosser
1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
Went to the website to opt-in and found I didn't have to change anything.
RP
2008/7/15 Apptech <RemoveMEapptech
TakeThisOuTparadise.net.nz>:
{Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
> Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
> TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
>
>
> -
2008\07\14@172603
by
William \Chops\ Westfield
On Jul 14, 2008, at 6:02 AM, Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
I am receiving TECH automatically, as a result of never
having turned on ANY filtering.
BillW
2008\07\14@181101
by
Heinz Czychun
Hi to all fellow Techies,
I explicitly subscribed, not wanting to miss a bit, #2.
TTFN,
Heinz
On 14-Jul-08, at 9:02 AM, Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
2008\07\14@190726
by
cdb
I'm a number 2, quite few people I suspect, agree as well!
Colin
:: I'd be interested in knowing how many people
::
:: 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
:: 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
:: 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
:: unsubscribe.
--
cdb, colinEraseME
.....btech-online.co.uk on 15/07/2008
Web presence: http://www.btech-online.co.uk
Hosted by: http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=7988359
Friendship multiplies the good of life and divides the evil.
Baltasar Gracian
2008\07\14@225510
by
Andrew Burchill
:: 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>
autopilot for me, think I'm receiving all channels anyway.
Andrew Burchill
2008\07\15@030104
by
Artem Zezyulinskiy
I'm receiving it automatically.
Artem
Apptech a écrit :
{Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
> Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
> TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
>
>
>
2008\07\15@084449
by
Gerhard Fiedler
Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
I normally read the piclist through gmane.org, and their account doesn't
seem to receive TECH. So for now I'm without, until I change my habits
and my setup.
FWIW, I notified the person who seems to run gmane.org, but he seems to
have better things to do :)
Gerhard
2008\07\15@120249
by
Paul Hutchinson
Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
#2, I explicitly subscribed to TECH
Paul Hutch
2008\07\15@123047
by
Alex Harford
Missed your original email because,
> #2, I explicitly subscribed to TECH
2008\07\15@125407
by
Alan Schnittman
#2. Back to lurking...
At 09:02 AM 7/14/2008, you wrote:
>I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
>1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
>unsubscribe.
>
>Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
>de-lurk visibly.
>
>Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
>TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
>
2008\07\15@183741
by
Howard Winter
Russell,
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:02:26 +1200, Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
I didn't even realise a TECH tag had been added until I started to see messages with it!
I suppose I was automatically subscribed. I've just written a filter to place anything with this tag into the (new) "folder" I've created for it, as I do with each PIClist
tag.
Cheers,
Howard Winter
St.Albans, England
2008\07\25@075303
by
Matthew Rhys-Roberts
#1 applies to me :)
I didn't know it was possible to un/subscribe other tags. Or I'd
forgotten there was an email list preferences form somewhere.
Matt
Wrexham, UK
Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
2008\07\25@131835
by
Sean Breheny
Same here.
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Picbits Sales <EraseMEsales
picbits.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm getting it automagically without having to change anything in my Piclist
> settings.
>
> I think I've got mine to receive all posts
>
> Dom
> {Original Message removed}
2008\07\25@143209
by
Stephen D. Barnes
>
>>> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>>>
>>> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
>>> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
>>> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
>>> unsubscribe.
>>>
#2 for me.
--
Regards,
Stephen D. Barnes
2008\07\27@031829
by
Ray Warren
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:02:26AM +1200, Apptech wrote:
> I'd be interested in knowing how many people
>
> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically.
> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH
> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to
> unsubscribe.
>
> Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to
> de-lurk visibly.
>
> Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in
> TECH but useful for people to see who is present here.
>
>
>
> Russell
I am receiving the TECH material automatically.I do not have any filters
set on the piclist site,
Ray Warren
'[TECH]:: TECH membership'
2008\08\17@180328
by
Dario Greggio
Picbits Sales wrote:
> I'm getting it automagically without having to change anything in my Piclist
> settings.
same here
--
Ciao, Dario -- ADPM Synthesis sas -- http://www.adpm.tk
More... (looser matching)
- Last day of these posts
- In 2008
, 2009 only
- Today
- New search...