Post by thread:[TECH]:: TECH membership

I'd be interested in knowing how many people 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to unsubscribe. Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to de-lurk visibly. Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. Russell

Have explicitly subscribed to TECH Will have to see how this shakes out. Have previously subscribed only to PIC and EE. Sometimes a thread seems to go on and on with little new info, and probably I have contributed to that :( also. Too much mail, using delete key without reading message, but then again there is detail of use to others, kind of grin and bear (bare (sp)) it.:) And I am guilty of seeking help on stuff that is now considered off topic (Linux and Windows), where I have exhausted other more pertinent forums and found the solution here. Moderating should be somewhat tolerant, if only occasional and not abused. Overall, think the list is good. :) Apptech wrote: {Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > > Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in > TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell > > >

I opted in --- Bob Ammerman ----- Original Message ----- From: "Apptech" <spam_OUTapptechTakeThisOuTparadise.net.nz> To: "PIC List" <.....PICLISTKILLspam@spam@MIT.EDU> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 9:02 AM Subject: [TECH]:: TECH membership {Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > > Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in > TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell > > > --

This isn't a trick question is it ... ? Ya still got me all bamboozled over that nonsense that OT doesn't stand for On Topic! Okay, okay I'll slither back into lurch mode now ... RiB On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Apptech <apptechKILLspamparadise.net.nz> wrote: {Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > > Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in > TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell > >

Apptech, I am receiving TECH tag material automatically without doing amything. Derward ----- Original Message ----- From: "Apptech" <.....apptechKILLspam.....paradise.net.nz> To: "PIC List" <EraseMEPICLISTspam_OUTTakeThisOuTmit.edu> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 8:02 AM Subject: [TECH]:: TECH membership > I'd be interested in knowing how many people <snip> > Russell <snip>

DANG Russell! You mean we been disruptin' all those 'lectrons for naught in order to opt in?! Sorry, I forgot to mention that I opted in ... and don't even think for a nanosecond that I'm gonna unscribledebibble and let ya off the hook! RiB On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Derward Myrick <wdmyrickspam_OUTearthlink.net> wrote: > Apptech, I am receiving TECH tag material automatically without doing > amything. > > Derward > > ... >

I plan to subscribe ASAP. Busy. --Bob On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:02 AM, Apptech <@spam@apptechKILLspamparadise.net.nz> wrote: {Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > > Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in > TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell > > > -

I started doing stuff to get it, forgot my password then ran out of time but i still seem to be getting it ;-> Derward Myrick wrote: {Quote hidden}> Apptech, I am receiving TECH tag material automatically without doing > amything. > > Derward > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Apptech" <KILLspamapptechKILLspamparadise.net.nz> > To: "PIC List" <RemoveMEPICLISTTakeThisOuTmit.edu> > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 8:02 AM > Subject: [TECH]:: TECH membership > > > >> I'd be interested in knowing how many people >> > <snip> > >> Russell >> > > <snip> > > >

2008/7/14 Apptech <spamBeGoneapptechspamBeGoneparadise.net.nz>: > I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > opted-in, (#2) D

(2) for me - I had to explicitly subscribe. dwayne At 07:02 AM 7/14/2008, Apptech wrote: {Quote hidden}>I'd be interested in knowing how many people > >1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. >2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH >3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to >unsubscribe. > >Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to >de-lurk visibly. > >Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in >TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. -- Dwayne Reid <TakeThisOuTdwaynerEraseMEspam_OUTplanet.eon.net> Trinity Electronics Systems Ltd Edmonton, AB, CANADA (780) 489-3199 voice (780) 487-6397 fax http://www.trinity-electronics.com Custom Electronics Design and Manufacturing

I had to opt-in. Receiving posts just fine now. Back to lurking . . --Don-- Apptech wrote: {Quote hidden}>I'd be interested in knowing how many people > >1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. >2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH >3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to >unsubscribe. > >Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to >de-lurk visibly. > >Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in >TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell > > > >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:02:26AM +1200, Apptech wrote: > I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. Have always subscribed to everything, and use my email clients thread-delete button with abandon... :) - -- http://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIe2983bMhDbI9xWQRAidfAJ9w+kFFCRzL8jdT7a7uTDxs+1QwKwCffs9R nQbgD17jSxVqQn7ZNq06EVM= =bE33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Apptech wrote: > I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > I do not know if I would have received TECH automatically because I immediately explicitly subscribed (#2) when the news was out. Gaston

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:02:26 +1200, Apptech wrote: >I'd be interested in knowing how many people > >1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. >2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH >3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to >unsubscribe. 2. I "Have explicitly subscribed to TECH". Regards, Bob

Confirmed infoholic with an Apptech habit. Did nothing to subscribe. The system knows. Yair. On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:02:26AM +1200, Apptech wrote: {Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > > Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in > TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell > > > --

Carl Denk wrote: {Quote hidden}> Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > > Will have to see how this shakes out. Have previously subscribed only to PIC and EE. Sometimes a thread seems to go on and on with little new info, and probably I have contributed to that :( also. Too much mail, using delete key without reading message, but then again there is detail of use to others, kind of grin and bear (bare (sp)) it.:) > > And I am guilty of seeking help on stuff that is now considered off topic (Linux and Windows), where I have exhausted other more pertinent forums and found the solution here. Moderating should be somewhat tolerant, if only occasional and not abused. > > Overall, think the list is good. :) > > > > Apptech wrote: > >> I'd be interested in knowing how many people >> >> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. >> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH >> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to >> unsubscribe. >> >> >> 1. Receiving automatically 2. Did NOT subscribe to TECH 3. Will wait and see Vic -- *____________________________________________________________________________________________* *Victor Fraenckel KC2GUI windswaytoo ATSIGN gmail DOT com** *

>1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. I was set to subscribe to everything and still get everything including tech. > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > Afiact this only happened if you were previously set to receive everything. Since afaict TECH is meant to fit somewhere between EE and OT I would hope that there would be very few if any people in this category.

1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. Went to the website to opt-in and found I didn't have to change anything. RP 2008/7/15 Apptech <RemoveMEapptechTakeThisOuTparadise.net.nz>: {Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > > Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in > TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell > > > -

Hi to all fellow Techies, I explicitly subscribed, not wanting to miss a bit, #2. TTFN, Heinz On 14-Jul-08, at 9:02 AM, Apptech wrote: > I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. >

I'm a number 2, quite few people I suspect, agree as well! Colin :: I'd be interested in knowing how many people :: :: 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. :: 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH :: 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to :: unsubscribe. -- cdb, colinEraseME.....btech-online.co.uk on 15/07/2008 Web presence: http://www.btech-online.co.uk Hosted by: http://www.1and1.co.uk/?k_id=7988359 Friendship multiplies the good of life and divides the evil. Baltasar Gracian

I'm receiving it automatically. Artem Apptech a écrit : {Quote hidden}> I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > > Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in > TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell > > >

Apptech wrote: > I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > I normally read the piclist through gmane.org, and their account doesn't seem to receive TECH. So for now I'm without, until I change my habits and my setup. FWIW, I notified the person who seems to run gmane.org, but he seems to have better things to do :) Gerhard

Apptech wrote: > I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > #2, I explicitly subscribed to TECH Paul Hutch

#2. Back to lurking... At 09:02 AM 7/14/2008, you wrote: >I'd be interested in knowing how many people > >1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. >2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH >3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to >unsubscribe. > >Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to >de-lurk visibly. > >Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in >TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell >

Russell, On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:02:26 +1200, Apptech wrote: > I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. I didn't even realise a TECH tag had been added until I started to see messages with it! I suppose I was automatically subscribed. I've just written a filter to place anything with this tag into the (new) "folder" I've created for it, as I do with each PIClist tag. Cheers, Howard Winter St.Albans, England

#1 applies to me :) I didn't know it was possible to un/subscribe other tags. Or I'd forgotten there was an email list preferences form somewhere. Matt Wrexham, UK Apptech wrote: > I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. >

Same here. On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Picbits Sales <EraseMEsalespicbits.co.uk> wrote: > I'm getting it automagically without having to change anything in my Piclist > settings. > > I think I've got mine to receive all posts > > Dom > {Original Message removed}

> >>> I'd be interested in knowing how many people >>> >>> 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. >>> 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH >>> 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to >>> unsubscribe. >>> #2 for me. -- Regards, Stephen D. Barnes

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:02:26AM +1200, Apptech wrote: > I'd be interested in knowing how many people > > 1. Are receiving TECH tag material automatically. > 2. Have explicitly subscribed to TECH > 3. Have been automatically subscribed but intent to > unsubscribe. > > Reply to onlist preferably or to me if you don't want to > de-lurk visibly. > > Not the sort of thing we'd probably usually do much of in > TECH but useful for people to see who is present here. > > > > Russell I am receiving the TECH material automatically.I do not have any filters set on the piclist site, Ray Warren